I've always had a keen interest in the mechanics of popular music, and, as I've grown older, that has led to short, intense obsessions with certain songs and artists, what my friend Ian calls 'rabbit holes' - things you disappear into, occasionally ill-advisedly. Where appropriate, I'll share some of my findings here. Naturally, I find what follows fascinating - other viewpoints may apply.
Amoureuse is a song that was written in 1972 by French singer-songwriter Veronique Sanson. Sanson was inspired by staying out late with her boyfriend. As she drove home early in the morning (she still lived with her parents) she realised that she was, for the first time, in love, with all the excitement and uncertainty that brings - amoureuse is a feminine noun meaning 'a woman in love'. It's a great song, and Veronique's version of the song is sung well, but is a little matter-of-fact - the backing is quite flat and doesn't build anywhere near enough tension as it moves to the chorus.
In America, songwriter Patti Dahlstrom was asked by Warner Brothers to rewrite the original for an American audience. She dispensed with the original lyrics, and instead simply wrote down what came into her head as she listened, concocting a scenario about a woman in a tenuous and frustrating relationship who, nevertheless, is unable to break away because of the passion of the affair. Retitled 'Emotion' (which perhaps sums up the less nuanced nature of the lyric), it was a US hit in 1974 for the engaging and hugely successful American based Australian singer Helen Reddy.
This take is poppy, slightly lightweight, occasionally verging on being a country ballad. It has its charms ('then you stumble in - and I am tumbling back to where it begins' is the highlight, I think), but it lacks the depth of the Osborne version or, indeed, the original.
Sanson has said that Reddy's perky take was her favourite version of the song, but it could be that a. it is different enough from the original to be admired with detachment and / or b. it made her the most money.
No comments:
Post a Comment